Triple
T11889651
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Meskwaki syllabary |
E282880
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | indigenous writing system |
C30560
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: indigenous writing system Context triple: [Meskwaki syllabary, instanceOf, indigenous writing system]
-
A.
Osage-language writing system
The Osage-language writing system is a modern, standardized orthography, including a unique alphabet, designed specifically to represent the sounds and structure of the Osage language accurately and support its revitalization.
-
B.
ancient writing system
An ancient writing system is a structured method of visually representing language used by early civilizations to record information, communicate, and preserve cultural, religious, or administrative knowledge.
-
C.
Mesoamerican writing system
A Mesoamerican writing system is a structured set of visual symbols and conventions developed by pre-Columbian cultures in Mesoamerica to record language, convey information, and represent cultural, religious, and political concepts.
-
D.
indigenous Philippine script
An indigenous Philippine script is a traditional writing system developed by native Filipino ethnolinguistic groups, historically used to record their languages, culture, and knowledge before and alongside colonial influences.
-
E.
Mesoamerican script
A Mesoamerican script is a writing system developed by pre-Columbian cultures in Mesoamerica, using combinations of logographic and syllabic signs to record language, history, and ritual knowledge.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab2a90b08190a4e818821cc93e6d |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:44 p.m.