Triple

T11887301
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rainy River E282819 entity
Predicate majorCrossBorderRiver P93095 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Rainy River, majorCrossBorderRiver, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: majorCrossBorderRiver
Context triple: [Rainy River, majorCrossBorderRiver, yes]
  • A. transboundaryRiverOf chosen
    Indicates that a river crosses or forms the boundary between two or more political or administrative regions.
  • B. transboundaryBasin
    Indicates that a river basin or watershed extends across and is shared by the territories of two or more political or administrative jurisdictions.
  • C. betweenRiver
    Indicates a spatial relationship where something is located in the area separating two rivers or lies in the intermediate region defined by them.
  • D. isMajorWatercourseOf
    Indicates that a watercourse is a primary or significant river or stream associated with, or flowing through, a particular geographic area or feature.
  • E. associatedRiverBasin
    Indicates that one entity is linked to, or lies within the drainage area of, a particular river basin.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab2a90b08190a4e818821cc93e6d completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8d3a13370819086386fecb99e4f0b completed April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d8bb2fca4481909893f3428b0871ac completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:44 p.m.