Triple
T11882333
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alcibiades I |
E282688
|
entity |
| Predicate | authenticityDebate |
P76208
|
FINISHED |
| Object | some scholars regard it as spurious |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: some scholars regard it as spurious | Statement: [Alcibiades I, authenticityDebate, some scholars regard it as spurious]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authenticityDebate Context triple: [Alcibiades I, authenticityDebate, some scholars regard it as spurious]
-
A.
debatedBetween
chosen
Indicates a situation in which two or more parties engage in a discussion or argument over differing views about a particular issue or topic.
-
B.
historicityDebate
Indicates a debate or scholarly dispute over whether an event, figure, or narrative is historically factual or actually occurred.
-
C.
debatedWithin
Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
-
D.
isAuthentic
Indicates that something is genuine, real, or true to its claimed origin, nature, or standard.
-
E.
debatedAs
Indicates that one entity is discussed or argued over in terms of being equivalent to, or serving in the role of, another entity within a debate or comparative argument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab2a90b08190a4e818821cc93e6d |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8d39d2934819093b9f7006f45e5cb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 10:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8bb272f88819090c37c944c5a60ab |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:44 p.m.