Triple

T11870204
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Contrapunctus VI E282387 entity
Predicate workNumberWithinCollection P70295 FINISHED
Object 6 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 6 | Statement: [Contrapunctus VI, workNumberWithinCollection, 6]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: workNumberWithinCollection
Context triple: [Contrapunctus VI, workNumberWithinCollection, 6]
  • A. workNumberInSet
    Indicates that a particular work number belongs to, or is included within, a specified set of work numbers.
  • B. workNumbering chosen
    Indicates that a specific numbering or cataloging identifier is assigned to a work within a larger collection or system.
  • C. appearsInWorkNumber
    Indicates that an entity is featured or occurs within a specific numbered work in a series or collection.
  • D. worksNumber
    Indicates that an entity is identified or referenced by a specific works number, typically denoting a particular work, item, or production instance.
  • E. hasNumberWithinWork
    Indicates that a specific number or numeric value is contained, referenced, or used within a particular work (such as a document, publication, or creative piece).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab2945d081908a5851c916cbcfb5 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a73c04e4819084c0b2ff8e5d2f04 completed April 10, 2026, 7:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d8a2589f0c8190ad82ff11acabae93 completed April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:43 p.m.