Triple
T1186880
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Economy of Egypt |
E25266
|
entity |
| Predicate | keyAgriculturalProduct |
P1897
|
FINISHED |
| Object | cotton |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: cotton | Statement: [Economy of Egypt, keyAgriculturalProduct, cotton]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: keyAgriculturalProduct Context triple: [Economy of Egypt, keyAgriculturalProduct, cotton]
-
A.
traditionalAgriculturalProduct
Indicates that something is recognized as an agricultural product produced using long-established, customary methods and practices.
-
B.
typeOfFarmProductInDispute
Indicates that a specific kind of farm product is the subject of a disagreement, conflict, or legal dispute between parties.
-
C.
majorCrop
chosen
Indicates that a particular crop is one of the primary or most important crops cultivated in a given area or context.
-
D.
agriculturalPractice
Indicates a relationship where an entity engages in, applies, or is associated with a specific method or technique of agriculture or farming.
-
E.
crop
Indicates the action of cutting or trimming part of an object or image, typically to remove unwanted outer areas while keeping a selected region.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49427d98881908646d6c63b8cea1e |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bd5578b08190bbe4089857fbf166 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:27 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb5bacc481909e8dfd5215e4711a |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:45 p.m.