Triple
T11864403
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Working Tax Credit |
E282244
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusForMostNewClaimants |
P101939
|
FINISHED |
| Object | closed to new claims |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: closed to new claims | Statement: [Working Tax Credit, statusForMostNewClaimants, closed to new claims]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusForMostNewClaimants Context triple: [Working Tax Credit, statusForMostNewClaimants, closed to new claims]
-
A.
statusOfClaim
Indicates the current state or condition of a specific claim within a process or system.
-
B.
numberOfClaimants
Indicates the quantity of individuals or parties making a claim in a given context or case.
-
C.
statusIncludes
Indicates that one entity’s status set contains or encompasses the status (or statuses) of another entity.
-
D.
complainantStatus
Indicates the role or standing of the person or party making a complaint in relation to the case or issue.
-
E.
supportedClaimant
Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, backing, or advocacy in favor of another entity who is making a claim or seeking a benefit.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab2945d081908a5851c916cbcfb5 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a73883508190a78b5f4ba4a220df |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8a2573dbc8190ab432e8e28fde6cc |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d8a43cc0c881909fed7cd759fe90b1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:43 p.m.