Triple
T11861334
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Rostker v. Goldberg |
E282164
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg et al. |
E282164
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg et al. | Statement: [Rostker v. Goldberg, fullCaseName, Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg et al.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg et al. Context triple: [Rostker v. Goldberg, fullCaseName, Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg et al.]
-
A.
Rostker v. Goldberg
chosen
Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
-
B.
United States v. O'Brien
United States v. O'Brien is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a federal law banning the destruction of draft cards and established an important test for evaluating government regulation of symbolic speech under the First Amendment.
-
C.
Gelbard v. United States
Gelbard v. United States is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether grand jury witnesses could refuse to answer questions based on the government's alleged illegal use of wiretap evidence.
-
D.
Kleindienst
Kleindienst is a German-language surname most notably associated with Richard G. Kleindienst, a former U.S. Attorney General during the Nixon administration.
-
E.
Goldberg v. Kelly
Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab2945d081908a5851c916cbcfb5 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a69b16bc8190999a0c1240f9ce6a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:28 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f281745ca88190968e1f674d0e483c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 10:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:43 p.m.