Triple
T11848171
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Europe/Rome |
E281835
|
entity |
| Predicate | phpTimeZoneID |
P101836
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Europe/Rome |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Europe/Rome | Statement: [Europe/Rome, phpTimeZoneID, Europe/Rome]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: phpTimeZoneID Context triple: [Europe/Rome, phpTimeZoneID, Europe/Rome]
-
A.
timeZoneEndpoint
Indicates a connection or boundary point where a specific time zone applies or is defined.
-
B.
IANATimeZoneIdentifierExample
Indicates that the relationship provides an example of an IANA time zone identifier corresponding to a given time zone or context.
-
C.
MicrosoftTimeZoneIdentifier
Indicates the specific Microsoft-defined time zone identifier associated with an entity or event.
-
D.
timeZoneRegionType
Indicates the classification of a time zone based on the type of geographic or administrative region it is associated with.
-
E.
timeZoneDatabase
Indicates that there is an association between something (such as a system, service, or region) and a specific time zone database it uses or is defined by.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab287ba48190a5178779fd19b9b7 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a65c72088190b8de9550c455b788 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8a254a57481908a1e6ad97919c416 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d8a43cc0c881909fed7cd759fe90b1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:43 p.m.