Triple
T11832710
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Olomana Trail |
E281432
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUnmarkedSections |
P101727
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Olomana Trail, hasUnmarkedSections, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUnmarkedSections Context triple: [Olomana Trail, hasUnmarkedSections, true]
-
A.
hasSectionCount
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific number of sections it contains or comprises.
-
B.
hasSect
Indicates that an entity includes, contains, or is associated with a particular sect or subgroup within a larger religious, ideological, or organizational context.
-
C.
hasSectionOn
Indicates that one entity (typically a document or resource) contains a dedicated section or part that specifically addresses or discusses another entity or topic.
-
D.
hasSectionWith
Indicates that an entity contains or includes a specific section that satisfies certain conditions or characteristics.
-
E.
hasSectionIn
Indicates that one entity contains or includes another entity as a section or subdivision within it.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab276f8c8190b1966a0ef11349ac |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a62c95988190a45dbaa7001c8846 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8a251fc08819095933f1d13c3b742 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d8a43cc0c881909fed7cd759fe90b1 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:43 p.m.