Triple
T11825924
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indian Contract Act 1872 |
E281259
|
entity |
| Predicate | originallyContainedPart |
P29195
|
FINISHED |
| Object | provisions on sale of goods |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: provisions on sale of goods | Statement: [Indian Contract Act 1872, originallyContainedPart, provisions on sale of goods]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originallyContainedPart Context triple: [Indian Contract Act 1872, originallyContainedPart, provisions on sale of goods]
-
A.
previouslyContained
Indicates that one entity was contained within another entity at some point in the past, but is not necessarily contained there now.
-
B.
usedToBePartOf
chosen
Indicates that an entity was formerly a component or member of another entity but is no longer part of it.
-
C.
previouslyContainedRegion
Indicates that one region used to spatially contain another region at some earlier time, but does not necessarily do so now.
-
D.
reconstructedAsPartOf
Indicates that one entity has been rebuilt, restored, or recreated as a component or segment of another, larger whole.
-
E.
partlyConsistsOf
Indicates that one entity is composed in part, but not entirely, of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab276f8c8190b1966a0ef11349ac |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a5eb299481909de3c0e85628fbe4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8a251fc08819095933f1d13c3b742 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:43 p.m.