Triple
T11821133
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Paul Best |
E281130
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasUnorthodoxViewOn |
P28131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | doctrine of the Trinity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: doctrine of the Trinity | Statement: [Paul Best, hasUnorthodoxViewOn, doctrine of the Trinity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUnorthodoxViewOn Context triple: [Paul Best, hasUnorthodoxViewOn, doctrine of the Trinity]
-
A.
hasDifferentOpinionsOn
chosen
Indicates that two or more entities hold differing views or judgments regarding a particular topic, issue, or subject.
-
B.
hasIdeologicalPosition
Indicates that an entity holds, endorses, or is associated with a particular ideological stance or viewpoint.
-
C.
notableViewpoints
Indicates that an entity is associated with significant or noteworthy viewpoints, perspectives, or opinions.
-
D.
hasOpposedIdea
Indicates that one entity holds an idea that conflicts with, contradicts, or stands in opposition to the idea held by another entity.
-
E.
hasControversialAspect
Indicates that something includes an element, feature, or aspect that is disputed, debated, or likely to cause disagreement or public criticism.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab26aae88190b2489efcb2a24234 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a5e87e488190905bc3bb6d721e56 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8a251fc08819095933f1d13c3b742 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:42 p.m.