Triple
T11813703
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Romania and Moldova |
E280940
|
entity |
| Predicate | shareLanguagePolicyDebate |
P33151
|
FINISHED |
| Object | status of Romanian vs Moldovan language in Moldova |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: status of Romanian vs Moldovan language in Moldova | Statement: [Romania and Moldova, shareLanguagePolicyDebate, status of Romanian vs Moldovan language in Moldova]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: shareLanguagePolicyDebate Context triple: [Romania and Moldova, shareLanguagePolicyDebate, status of Romanian vs Moldovan language in Moldova]
-
A.
languageOfDebate
Indicates that a specified language is the one used for conducting a particular debate.
-
B.
languagePolicyIssue
chosen
Indicates that there is a problem, conflict, or concern related to rules or practices governing language use.
-
C.
languageAdvocated
Indicates that an entity actively supports, promotes, or argues in favor of the use or adoption of a particular language.
-
D.
languagePolicyAspect
Indicates an aspect or component of a broader language policy, such as its goals, rules, or implementation measures.
-
E.
policyLanguage
Indicates the specific wording or formulation used within a policy to express its rules, conditions, or provisions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab26aae88190b2489efcb2a24234 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a658f918819092c2db05fe2ab0ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8a24e9a088190aff7932d1ff93dbf |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:42 p.m.