Triple
T11801141
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | RFC 1869 |
E280627
|
entity |
| Predicate | ensuresCompatibilityWith |
P30800
|
FINISHED |
| Object | existing SMTP implementations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: existing SMTP implementations | Statement: [RFC 1869, ensuresCompatibilityWith, existing SMTP implementations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ensuresCompatibilityWith Context triple: [RFC 1869, ensuresCompatibilityWith, existing SMTP implementations]
-
A.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
B.
requiresCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity can only function correctly or be used if it is compatible with another specified entity.
-
C.
isGenerallyCompatibleWith
Indicates that two entities can typically function or coexist together without significant conflict, issues, or need for special adaptation.
-
D.
compatibilityModel
Indicates that one entity is defined or evaluated according to a specific compatibility framework, standard, or model in relation to another entity.
-
E.
compatibilityGoal
chosen
Indicates that one entity has an objective or intended outcome related to being compatible or achieving compatibility with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab258b808190b1735835c841e3a4 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a658f918819092c2db05fe2ab0ce |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8a24e9a088190aff7932d1ff93dbf |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:42 p.m.