Triple
T11783562
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Newman |
E280210
|
entity |
| Predicate | oreQuality |
P6861
|
FINISHED |
| Object | high-grade iron ore |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high-grade iron ore | Statement: [Newman, oreQuality, high-grade iron ore]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: oreQuality Context triple: [Newman, oreQuality, high-grade iron ore]
-
A.
storageQuality
Indicates the degree or standard of how well something is stored, such as its preservation, safety, or suitability for use.
-
B.
quality
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses a particular attribute, characteristic, or degree of excellence that defines how good, suitable, or effective it is in a given context.
-
C.
hasSurfaceQuality
Indicates that one entity possesses a particular characteristic or condition of its surface.
-
D.
supportsQuality
Indicates that one entity contributes to maintaining, enhancing, or ensuring the quality or standard of another entity or process.
-
E.
fieldQuality
Indicates the assessed level or degree of quality associated with a particular field or attribute in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab258b808190b1735835c841e3a4 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a8c2e8b08190a31b1e284fca2aee |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:37 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8a242cd8c819086ed6c5f292dc8cb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:09 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:42 p.m.