Triple

T11775659
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Florestan E280011 entity
Predicate imprisonmentStatus P13715 FINISHED
Object unjustly imprisoned LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unjustly imprisoned | Statement: [Florestan, imprisonmentStatus, unjustly imprisoned]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: imprisonmentStatus
Context triple: [Florestan, imprisonmentStatus, unjustly imprisoned]
  • A. detaineeStatus chosen
    Indicates the current legal or custodial condition of a person being detained, such as whether they are in custody, released, or under a specific detention regime.
  • B. imprisonedFor
    Indicates that one entity is held in detention or jail as a consequence of, or in connection with, a specific reason, action, or offense committed by another entity or itself.
  • C. imprisonedWith
    Indicates that two entities are confined or held in prison together at the same time and place.
  • D. hasBeenImprisonedBy
    Indicates that one entity has been confined or incarcerated under the authority or control of another entity.
  • E. imprisonmentContext
    Indicates that one entity is held in confinement or custody by another entity or authority within a specific legal, temporal, or situational context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab01d2688190ad8ed6bda487eaa5 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a8c2e8b08190a31b1e284fca2aee completed April 10, 2026, 7:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d8a242cd8c819086ed6c5f292dc8cb completed April 10, 2026, 7:09 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:42 p.m.