Triple
T11760989
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Qalla Q’asa sector |
E279653
|
entity |
| Predicate | relativeLocationWithinPisac |
P101230
|
FINISHED |
| Object | upper complex above main terraces |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: upper complex above main terraces | Statement: [Qalla Q’asa sector, relativeLocationWithinPisac, upper complex above main terraces]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relativeLocationWithinPisac Context triple: [Qalla Q’asa sector, relativeLocationWithinPisac, upper complex above main terraces]
-
A.
hasRelativePositionToLicancabur
Indicates that one entity has a specific spatial or geographic position defined in relation to Licancabur.
-
B.
hasRelativePositionOnCerroDeLaSilla
Indicates that one entity has a specific spatial or locational relationship relative to Cerro de la Silla.
-
C.
relativeLocationOnIsland
Indicates a spatial relationship where one entity’s position is described relative to another entity specifically in the context of being on an island.
-
D.
NazcaLinesLocation
Indicates that a location is the site where the Nazca Lines are found or situated.
-
E.
ianaLocation
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific geographic or network location identified using an IANA-defined naming or coding scheme.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab01038c819080714901502c84fc |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a52386708190b744746a2db37495 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d88a829fe481909cc5431de7d6058e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d890467a2481909ce6c669e739c8de |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:41 p.m.