Triple

T11758949
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hudson family murders E279602 entity
Predicate hasAppealStatus P18643 FINISHED
Object conviction upheld on appeal LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conviction upheld on appeal | Statement: [Hudson family murders, hasAppealStatus, conviction upheld on appeal]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAppealStatus
Context triple: [Hudson family murders, hasAppealStatus, conviction upheld on appeal]
  • A. appealStatus chosen
    Indicates the current state or outcome of an appeal within a review or decision process.
  • B. hasAppealsTo
    Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
  • C. hasDisputedStatus
    Indicates that the status or classification of something is contested, uncertain, or not universally agreed upon.
  • D. hasDisputedStatusWith
    Indicates that there is a contested or unresolved status, claim, or standing between the related entities.
  • E. canBeAppealedTo
    Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab01038c819080714901502c84fc completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a5220f148190ae60d1941a579ab6 completed April 10, 2026, 7:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d88a829fe481909cc5431de7d6058e completed April 10, 2026, 5:28 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:41 p.m.