Triple
T11743723
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Calhoun County, Alabama |
E279217
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCity |
P316
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Piedmont, Alabama |
E640300
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Piedmont, Alabama | Statement: [Calhoun County, Alabama, hasCity, Piedmont, Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Piedmont, Alabama Context triple: [Calhoun County, Alabama, hasCity, Piedmont, Alabama]
-
A.
Piedmont, Alabama
chosen
Piedmont, Alabama is a small city in northeastern Alabama known for its location near the Talladega National Forest and the Chief Ladiga Trail.
-
B.
Roanoke, Alabama
Roanoke, Alabama is a small city in eastern Alabama known for its rural character and role as a local commercial and community hub.
-
C.
Sylvania, Alabama
Sylvania, Alabama is a small rural town in northeastern Alabama known for its close-knit community and location atop Sand Mountain.
-
D.
Columbia, Alabama
Columbia, Alabama is a small town in southeastern Alabama that forms part of the Dothan metropolitan area and is one of the older settlements in Houston County.
-
E.
Brent, Alabama
Brent, Alabama is a small city in central Alabama known for its rural character and location within Bibb County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab01038c819080714901502c84fc |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a4f191388190bd6ef7e80c41ca48 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:21 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f48a1d244c81908628b01afe467023 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:10 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:41 p.m.