Triple
T11741594
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Steve Spagnuolo |
E279166
|
entity |
| Predicate | tacticSpecialty |
P75814
|
FINISHED |
| Object | aggressive blitz-heavy defensive schemes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: aggressive blitz-heavy defensive schemes | Statement: [Steve Spagnuolo, tacticSpecialty, aggressive blitz-heavy defensive schemes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: tacticSpecialty Context triple: [Steve Spagnuolo, tacticSpecialty, aggressive blitz-heavy defensive schemes]
-
A.
tacticalStyle
Indicates the characteristic way in which an entity plans and executes actions or maneuvers to achieve its objectives.
-
B.
associatedWithTacticalAcuity
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, characterized by, or demonstrates tactical acuity in planning or executing actions.
-
C.
tactic
Indicates a strategic method or maneuver employed by one entity to influence, counter, or gain advantage over another in a specific context.
-
D.
hasPrimaryTactic
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with its main or most commonly used tactic or method of operation.
-
E.
describedTactic
Indicates that one entity has provided an explanation or account of a particular tactic used or proposed by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab01038c819080714901502c84fc |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a4f025f88190a39280806c9d7c33 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:21 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d88a813cc48190a3dfdc60e8af80ae |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:41 p.m.