Triple
T11721279
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kitanemuk language |
E278635
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSubject |
P450
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kitanemuk grammar |
E278635
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kitanemuk grammar | Statement: [Kitanemuk language, hasSubject, Kitanemuk grammar]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kitanemuk grammar Context triple: [Kitanemuk language, hasSubject, Kitanemuk grammar]
-
A.
Kitanemuk language
chosen
The Kitanemuk language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Kitanemuk people of Southern California.
-
B.
Kim language
The Kim language is a Central Chadic (Afro-Asiatic) language spoken by the Kim people in parts of Chad.
-
C.
Keiga language
The Keiga language is a Kadu (Kadugli) language spoken by the Keiga people in the Nuba Mountains region of Sudan.
-
D.
Kayabí language
The Kayabí language is an indigenous Tupian language spoken by the Kayabí people of Brazil, known for its role in preserving their cultural and linguistic heritage.
-
E.
Chimariko language
The Chimariko language is an extinct Native American language once spoken in northwestern California, often classified within the proposed Hokan language family.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaff2ce88190b4a1e4b341ad5377 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a4c373088190bc2ae77a1696d280 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:20 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ef83c8ac2c8190b3bba7db42734f3a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:40 p.m.