Triple
T11704856
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Creeping Winter |
E278211
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChallengeType |
P31731
|
FINISHED |
| Object | environmental hazards |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: environmental hazards | Statement: [Creeping Winter, hasChallengeType, environmental hazards]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChallengeType Context triple: [Creeping Winter, hasChallengeType, environmental hazards]
-
A.
hasChallenge
Indicates that an entity faces, experiences, or is confronted with a particular difficulty, obstacle, or problem.
-
B.
challengeType
chosen
Indicates the specific category or kind of challenge associated with an action or relationship between entities.
-
C.
basedOnChallengeType
Indicates that something is determined, derived, or configured according to a specific type or category of challenge.
-
D.
hasBeenChallengedIn
Indicates that an entity has faced a challenge, contest, or dispute within a specified context, domain, or setting.
-
E.
mayBeChallengedBy
Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to be opposed, questioned, or contested by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaff2ce88190b4a1e4b341ad5377 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a49c8c38819083d83f5fdec52b7f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d88a7b30948190b616a9db5c5488d5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:40 p.m.