Triple
T11702796
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Santa Maria de Jetibá |
E278166
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMajorEthnicOrigin |
P194
|
FINISHED |
| Object | German |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German | Statement: [Santa Maria de Jetibá, hasMajorEthnicOrigin, German]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMajorEthnicOrigin Context triple: [Santa Maria de Jetibá, hasMajorEthnicOrigin, German]
-
A.
holderEthnicity
Indicates the ethnic background or group to which the holder of something (e.g., a document, account, or item) belongs.
-
B.
ethnicOrigin
chosen
Indicates the relationship where an entity is associated with a particular ethnic group or ancestry.
-
C.
hasEthnicCharacteristic
Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular ethnic characteristic or identity.
-
D.
maternalEthnicOrigin
Indicates the ethnic background or heritage associated with an individual’s mother.
-
E.
hasSignificantEthnicCompositionIssue
Indicates that there is a notable problem or concern related to the ethnic composition or ethnic balance within the referenced entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaff2ce88190b4a1e4b341ad5377 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a49b1080819096593733ee48a187 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d88a7b30948190b616a9db5c5488d5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:40 p.m.