Triple

T11702239
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Riograndenser Hunsrückisch E278153 entity
Predicate hasContactSituationWith P4255 FINISHED
Object Portuguese language in Brazil LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Portuguese language in Brazil | Statement: [Riograndenser Hunsrückisch, hasContactSituationWith, Portuguese language in Brazil]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasContactSituationWith
Context triple: [Riograndenser Hunsrückisch, hasContactSituationWith, Portuguese language in Brazil]
  • A. hasContactRole
    Indicates that an entity serves in a specific role or capacity as a contact for another entity.
  • B. hasContactType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of contact relationship that exists between two entities.
  • C. hasKontakion
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or possesses a specific kontakion, i.e., a particular liturgical hymn or chant.
  • D. hasContactVariety
    Indicates that one entity is associated with a specific type or variety of contact information or communication channel.
  • E. historicalContactWith chosen
    Indicates that two entities have interacted or been in communication with each other at some point in the past.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aafe02d881909900d54ad7d4af84 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a49b1080819096593733ee48a187 completed April 10, 2026, 7:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d88a7b30948190b616a9db5c5488d5 completed April 10, 2026, 5:28 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:40 p.m.