Triple

T11700257
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Condorcet paradox E278103 entity
Predicate category P87 FINISHED
Object Paradoxes in social choice E278103 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Paradoxes in social choice | Statement: [Condorcet paradox, category, Paradoxes in social choice]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Paradoxes in social choice
Context triple: [Condorcet paradox, category, Paradoxes in social choice]
  • A. Arrow’s impossibility theorem
    Arrow’s impossibility theorem is a foundational result in social choice theory showing that no voting system can convert individual preferences into a collective ranking while simultaneously satisfying a set of seemingly reasonable fairness criteria.
  • B. Social Choice and Individual Values
    Social Choice and Individual Values is a foundational 1951 book by economist Kenneth Arrow that established modern social choice theory and introduced Arrow’s impossibility theorem.
  • C. Collective Choice and Social Welfare
    Collective Choice and Social Welfare is a foundational work in social choice theory that rigorously examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions while addressing issues of welfare, justice, and fairness.
  • D. Condorcet paradox chosen
    The Condorcet paradox is a voting theory phenomenon where collective preferences can become cyclic and inconsistent, even when individual voters’ preferences are perfectly rational and transitive.
  • E. Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem
    The Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem is a fundamental result in social choice theory showing that every reasonable voting system with at least three options is susceptible to strategic manipulation by voters.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aafe02d881909900d54ad7d4af84 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a49a025881909377c81d3debf465 completed April 10, 2026, 7:19 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f0195739348190b40a378ca227cf85 completed April 28, 2026, 2:20 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:40 p.m.