Triple
T11698479
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article V of the Florida Constitution |
E278057
|
entity |
| Predicate | governs |
P760
|
FINISHED |
| Object | judicial branch of Florida |
E33454
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: judicial branch of Florida | Statement: [Article V of the Florida Constitution, governs, judicial branch of Florida]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: judicial branch of Florida Context triple: [Article V of the Florida Constitution, governs, judicial branch of Florida]
-
A.
Florida courts
chosen
Florida courts are the judicial bodies within the state of Florida that interpret and apply state and federal law through a tiered system of trial and appellate courts.
-
B.
Judicial Branch of California
The Judicial Branch of California is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting and applying California law through the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal, and superior courts.
-
C.
Judicial branch of Michigan
The Judicial branch of Michigan is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting Michigan law, administering justice, and overseeing legal disputes through its hierarchy of trial and appellate courts, including the Michigan Supreme Court.
-
D.
Judicial branch of Alabama
The Judicial branch of Alabama is the state’s court system responsible for interpreting and applying Alabama law, headed by the Alabama Supreme Court and encompassing various appellate, trial, and specialized courts.
-
E.
Judicial branch of the State of Mississippi
The Judicial branch of the State of Mississippi is the state government branch responsible for interpreting and applying Mississippi law through a system of courts, headed by the Supreme Court of Mississippi.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aafe02d881909900d54ad7d4af84 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a47df68c81908a91919a69b4880d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:19 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ef147e2e10819085eaed83fd955b6b |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:40 p.m.