Triple
T11692519
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | COTS |
E277902
|
entity |
| Predicate | partnerOutcome |
P101293
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SpaceX completed COTS demonstration flights |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SpaceX completed COTS demonstration flights | Statement: [COTS, partnerOutcome, SpaceX completed COTS demonstration flights]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partnerOutcome Context triple: [COTS, partnerOutcome, SpaceX completed COTS demonstration flights]
-
A.
commissionOutcome
Indicates the result or consequence produced by a commission, such as whether it was successful, failed, or led to a particular decision or action.
-
B.
proposalOutcome
Indicates the result or status assigned to a proposal after it has been evaluated or decided upon.
-
C.
engagementOutcome
Indicates the result or consequence produced by a particular engagement, interaction, or campaign between entities.
-
D.
projectOutcome
Indicates the resulting state, impact, or consequences produced by carrying out a project.
-
E.
partnerAgency
Indicates a formal collaborative relationship in which one agency acts as a partner to another agency.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aafe02d881909900d54ad7d4af84 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a47a3ddc819098e208611148d15b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d88a7b30948190b616a9db5c5488d5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d89546a8688190b51455b5e12caf91 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:40 p.m.