Triple
T11685825
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Western Nilotic languages |
E277738
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMember |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lugbara language |
E262849
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lugbara language | Statement: [Western Nilotic languages, hasMember, Lugbara language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Lugbara language Context triple: [Western Nilotic languages, hasMember, Lugbara language]
-
A.
Lugbara language
chosen
The Lugbara language is a Central Sudanic language spoken primarily by the Lugbara people of northwestern Uganda and northeastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.
-
B.
Lusoga language
The Lusoga language is a Bantu language spoken primarily by the Basoga people in eastern Uganda.
-
C.
Lunda language
The Lunda language is a Bantu language spoken primarily in parts of Angola, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Zambia by the Lunda people.
-
D.
Tembe language
The Tembe language is an indigenous Tupi-Guarani language spoken by the Tembé people of northern Brazil.
-
E.
Nsenga language
The Nsenga language is a Bantu language spoken primarily in Zambia and neighboring regions, closely related to other languages of the area such as Tumbuka and Chewa.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aafe02d881909900d54ad7d4af84 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a463f6448190a4c8e1651a2bd905 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:19 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ef1433be908190b2ac887655a6c85a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:40 p.m.