Triple
T11681238
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | On the World |
E277618
|
entity |
| Predicate | likelyContained |
P95472
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stoic account of the world as an ordered whole |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stoic account of the world as an ordered whole | Statement: [On the World, likelyContained, Stoic account of the world as an ordered whole]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: likelyContained Context triple: [On the World, likelyContained, Stoic account of the world as an ordered whole]
-
A.
containedWith
Indicates that one entity is located or kept inside the bounds or interior space of another entity.
-
B.
typicallyContain
chosen
Indicates that one entity is normally or commonly found within, included in, or held by another entity under usual circumstances.
-
C.
alsoContains
Indicates that something includes, in addition to its primary contents, another specified element or component.
-
D.
mayEntail
Indicates that one statement or condition can logically lead to or imply the truth of another, without guaranteeing it.
-
E.
formerlyIncluded
Indicates that an entity was previously part of, contained in, or a member of another entity, but is no longer included.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aafd0a448190b44da30af8c6c519 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a462bb2881909238107d34c0a28d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d88a77e6e88190b7519100bde76575 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:28 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:40 p.m.