Triple
T11654785
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | MSA |
E276988
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsIdentifierType |
P100200
|
FINISHED |
| Object | email address |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: email address | Statement: [MSA, supportsIdentifierType, email address]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsIdentifierType Context triple: [MSA, supportsIdentifierType, email address]
-
A.
supportsType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, accepting, or being compatible with a specified type.
-
B.
supportsTargetType
Indicates that one entity is capable of operating with, handling, or being compatible with a specified target type.
-
C.
supportsUUIDType
Indicates that one entity provides compatibility with, or can correctly handle, data or values of the UUID type for another entity.
-
D.
supportsNameType
Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, recognizing, or being associated with a particular type or category of name.
-
E.
supportsIdentity
Indicates that one entity upholds, validates, or reinforces the identity, self-concept, or role of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aafbb3c081908a9cdb4ecb8d981d |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a3cee010819089cffdbefe5a6efb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d85ddc780481909a3bc63832fe2bd2 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:18 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d87f30642c8190ad94fa061cde186b |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:39 p.m.