Triple
T11647633
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge |
E276815
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | contract clause case |
C19536
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: contract clause case Context triple: [Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, instanceOf, contract clause case]
-
A.
legal clause
chosen
A legal clause is a distinct provision or section within a legal document that sets out specific rights, obligations, conditions, or procedures governing the parties involved.
-
B.
commerce clause
The Commerce Clause is a provision in the U.S. Constitution that grants Congress the power to regulate trade and economic activities among the states, with foreign nations, and with Native American tribes.
-
C.
legal agreement
A legal agreement is a formally recognized arrangement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and obligations under the law.
-
D.
competition law provision
A competition law provision is a legal rule or clause designed to regulate market behavior by preventing anti-competitive practices, promoting fair competition, and protecting consumer welfare.
-
E.
asiento contract
An asiento contract is a historical agreement, primarily used by the Spanish Crown, granting a private party or foreign power the exclusive right to supply goods or services—most infamously enslaved people—to Spanish territories under specified terms and conditions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aafbb3c081908a9cdb4ecb8d981d |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:39 p.m.