Triple
T11639229
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Understanding on Commitments in Financial Services |
E276615
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | international trade agreement instrument |
C6734
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: international trade agreement instrument Context triple: [Understanding on Commitments in Financial Services, instanceOf, international trade agreement instrument]
-
A.
international agreement
An international agreement is a formal, negotiated arrangement between two or more sovereign states or international organizations that creates binding obligations under international law.
-
B.
trade in services instrument
chosen
A trade in services instrument is a financial or contractual mechanism that facilitates, records, or manages cross-border transactions involving the provision of services rather than physical goods.
-
C.
trade policy instrument
A trade policy instrument is a specific tool or measure—such as tariffs, quotas, subsidies, or regulations—used by a government to influence international trade flows and economic outcomes.
-
D.
trade law
Trade law is the body of rules and principles governing the exchange of goods, services, and capital across borders, including treaties, regulations, and dispute resolution mechanisms between nations and commercial entities.
-
E.
international agreement implementation area
The international agreement implementation area is a defined domain—such as a sector, region, or policy field—within which the provisions of an international agreement are applied, monitored, and enforced.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aafa51148190ab84940694c00235 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:39 p.m.