Triple

T11635994
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ubique E276519 entity
Predicate hasFigurativeSense P93472 FINISHED
Object present on all fronts LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: present on all fronts | Statement: [Ubique, hasFigurativeSense, present on all fronts]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFigurativeSense
Context triple: [Ubique, hasFigurativeSense, present on all fronts]
  • A. figurativeMeaning chosen
    Indicates that one entity is used in a non-literal, metaphorical, or symbolic sense to convey a meaning about another entity or concept.
  • B. hasMetaphoricalForm
    Indicates that one entity is expressed, represented, or understood through a metaphorical form or figurative expression involving another entity.
  • C. hasLiteralMeaning
    Indicates that one entity expresses the direct, explicit meaning or sense of another entity (such as a word, phrase, or symbol).
  • D. hasSense
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular sensory perception, meaning, or interpretation.
  • E. hasIronicMeaning
    Indicates that something conveys a meaning opposite to or incongruent with its literal expression, creating an ironic effect.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aafa51148190ab84940694c00235 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a25d80208190b33e95db2e7cc276 completed April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d85dd94bdc819091fa2ed33eb31624 completed April 10, 2026, 2:18 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:39 p.m.