Triple
T11632142
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Publius Septimius Geta |
E276422
|
entity |
| Predicate | RomanImperialTitleNumbering |
P51882
|
FINISHED |
| Object | co-emperor with Caracalla |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: co-emperor with Caracalla | Statement: [Publius Septimius Geta, RomanImperialTitleNumbering, co-emperor with Caracalla]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: RomanImperialTitleNumbering Context triple: [Publius Septimius Geta, RomanImperialTitleNumbering, co-emperor with Caracalla]
-
A.
ordinalNumberAsEmperor
chosen
Indicates the numerical order in which a person held the title or role of emperor.
-
B.
roleInRomanSystem
Indicates that one entity holds a specific function, position, or status within the structure or hierarchy of the Roman system.
-
C.
underRomanRule
Indicates that one entity was politically controlled or governed by the Roman state or its authorities.
-
D.
RomanNumeral
Indicates that something is represented or written using the Roman numeral system.
-
E.
yearInRomanHistory
Indicates that a specific year is notable or relevant within the context of Roman history.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aafa51148190ab84940694c00235 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8a25aa9188190ab13d79139f37e7e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d85dd94bdc819091fa2ed33eb31624 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:18 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:39 p.m.