Triple

T11622989
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hall County E276186 entity
Predicate borders P224 FINISHED
Object Habersham County NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Habersham County | Statement: [Hall County, borders, Habersham County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Habersham County
Context triple: [Hall County, borders, Habersham County]
  • A. Habersham County chosen
    Habersham County is a county in northeastern Georgia known historically for its role in the state's gold mining region and its location in the scenic foothills of the Appalachian Mountains.
  • B. Bartow County
    Bartow County is a county in northwestern Georgia known for its rich history, natural resources, and role in the state’s gold-mining region.
  • C. Walker County
    Walker County is a county in the northwestern part of Georgia, known historically for its role in the state's mining and mineral-rich regions.
  • D. Walker County
    Walker County is a county in east-central Texas known for housing the city of Huntsville, several state prisons, and Sam Houston State University.
  • E. Walker County
    Walker County is a county in north-central Alabama known historically for its coal mining industry and rural communities.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aafa51148190ab84940694c00235 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8a122a3708190ab6513dad4c4fde7 completed April 10, 2026, 7:05 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:39 p.m.