Triple

T1160359
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Elm E24476 entity
Predicate errorHandlingModel P25610 FINISHED
Object Result type LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Result type | Statement: [Elm, errorHandlingModel, Result type]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: errorHandlingModel
Context triple: [Elm, errorHandlingModel, Result type]
  • A. errorRecovery
    Indicates that an entity detects a failure or error condition and initiates actions to restore normal or acceptable operation.
  • B. executionModel
    Indicates how a process, task, or operation is carried out or implemented, specifying the underlying method, strategy, or mechanism of its execution.
  • C. concurrentModel
    Indicates that two or more processes, activities, or states occur or are valid at the same time, potentially interacting or overlapping in execution.
  • D. exception
    Indicates that a particular case does not follow the usual rule, pattern, or condition that applies to others.
  • E. operatingModel
    Indicates how an organization structures and manages its processes, resources, and governance to deliver its products or services.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a494060e148190abb42f971242c197 completed March 1, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bcaf3a9081908bad2eba74dffbc1 completed March 1, 2026, 10:24 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb525b648190adcb7a29256d3c41 completed March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4bc49693c8190978ec63a5171d342 completed March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:45 p.m.