Triple
T11602487
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans |
E275165
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesHermeneutic |
P18616
|
FINISHED |
| Object | grammatical-historical method |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: grammatical-historical method | Statement: [Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, usesHermeneutic, grammatical-historical method]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesHermeneutic Context triple: [Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, usesHermeneutic, grammatical-historical method]
-
A.
styleOfExegesis
chosen
Indicates the particular interpretive method or approach applied when analyzing or explaining a text.
-
B.
scripturalUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a scriptural reference, source, or basis within the context or content of another entity.
-
C.
doctrinalCriticismBy
Indicates that a person or group expresses critical evaluation or disapproval of another’s doctrines, teachings, or belief system.
-
D.
scripturalExpertise
Indicates a relationship where one entity possesses specialized knowledge or authoritative understanding of religious scriptures in relation to another entity or context.
-
E.
theologicalInterpretation
Indicates a relationship where an event, text, or phenomenon is understood or explained through religious or doctrinal beliefs and principles.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aaf84b548190ac072e4fb89ae18f |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8954daa908190a8d532e43aa4a881 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d85dd20d188190863d1190d4c16048 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:38 p.m.