Triple

T11602041
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Basil Ransom E275153 entity
Predicate characterOpposedTo P18963 FINISHED
Object women’s suffrage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: women’s suffrage | Statement: [Basil Ransom, characterOpposedTo, women’s suffrage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: characterOpposedTo
Context triple: [Basil Ransom, characterOpposedTo, women’s suffrage]
  • A. hasAntagonisticProtagonist
    Indicates that the work features a main character who opposes or undermines the typical heroic or moral expectations of a traditional protagonist.
  • B. antagonistOf chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
  • C. typeOfOpposition
    Indicates a relationship where one entity stands in opposition or contrast to another, such as being a rival, adversary, or countering force.
  • D. antagonistStatus
    Indicates that an entity holds an opposing or adversarial role, often acting as the main source of conflict relative to another entity or objective.
  • E. facesAntagonistType
    Indicates that an entity confronts or opposes an antagonist of a specified type.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aae6b14c81908dc5a74bad7591f9 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8954daa908190a8d532e43aa4a881 completed April 10, 2026, 6:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d85dd20d188190863d1190d4c16048 completed April 10, 2026, 2:17 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:38 p.m.