Triple
T11575215
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mbum languages |
E274485
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMemberLanguage |
P7390
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Kim language
The Kim language is a Central Chadic (Afro-Asiatic) language spoken by the Kim people in parts of Chad.
|
E934392
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kim language | Statement: [Mbum languages, hasMemberLanguage, Kim language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kim language Context triple: [Mbum languages, hasMemberLanguage, Kim language]
-
A.
Jangil language
The Jangil language is an extinct and poorly documented Ongan language once spoken by the Jangil (Rutland Island) people of the Andaman Islands in India.
-
B.
Kitanemuk language
The Kitanemuk language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Kitanemuk people of Southern California.
-
C.
Karen languages
The Karen languages are a group of Sino-Tibetan languages spoken primarily by the Karen people in Myanmar and Thailand.
-
D.
Keiga language
The Keiga language is a Kadu (Kadugli) language spoken by the Keiga people in the Nuba Mountains region of Sudan.
-
E.
Khitan language
The Khitan language was the now-extinct tongue of the Khitan people of Northeast Asia, written in unique scripts and used by the ruling elite of the Liao dynasty.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Kim language Triple: [Mbum languages, hasMemberLanguage, Kim language]
Generated description
The Kim language is a Central Chadic (Afro-Asiatic) language spoken by the Kim people in parts of Chad.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Kim language Target entity description: The Kim language is a Central Chadic (Afro-Asiatic) language spoken by the Kim people in parts of Chad.
-
A.
Jangil language
The Jangil language is an extinct and poorly documented Ongan language once spoken by the Jangil (Rutland Island) people of the Andaman Islands in India.
-
B.
Kitanemuk language
The Kitanemuk language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Kitanemuk people of Southern California.
-
C.
Karen languages
The Karen languages are a group of Sino-Tibetan languages spoken primarily by the Karen people in Myanmar and Thailand.
-
D.
Keiga language
The Keiga language is a Kadu (Kadugli) language spoken by the Keiga people in the Nuba Mountains region of Sudan.
-
E.
Khitan language
The Khitan language was the now-extinct tongue of the Khitan people of Northeast Asia, written in unique scripts and used by the ruling elite of the Liao dynasty.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae5ac3c81908d2b0a3a665665b2 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d89048120c81908258f984711f7dd4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:53 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e713e49f508190b9bad316d68eab42 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 6:06 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69e720f9a8588190aa766d2e1628207a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:02 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69e72315dda08190996aa84587c5fc80 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 7:11 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:38 p.m.