Triple

T11572644
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bounty Law E274427 entity
Predicate metafictionalRole P12417 FINISHED
Object show-within-a-film LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: show-within-a-film | Statement: [Bounty Law, metafictionalRole, show-within-a-film]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: metafictionalRole
Context triple: [Bounty Law, metafictionalRole, show-within-a-film]
  • A. hasMetafictionalRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity plays a role within a story that self-consciously comments on, references, or breaks the conventions of fiction itself.
  • B. metaNarrativeRole
    Indicates the narrative function or role that one element (such as a character, voice, or device) plays in commenting on, framing, or reflecting the story itself at a meta-level.
  • C. literaryRole
    Indicates the specific narrative or functional role an entity holds within a literary work or text.
  • D. narrativeRoleContext
    Indicates the contextual narrative function or role an entity plays within a story or discourse (e.g., protagonist, antagonist, narrator) relative to other elements.
  • E. fictionalNarrator
    Indicates that one entity serves as the narrator or storytelling voice within a fictional work that features the other entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aae5ac3c81908d2b0a3a665665b2 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d88dd6913881908becf188c0a7a275 completed April 10, 2026, 5:42 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d85dcbacd0819094d4a1237055affa completed April 10, 2026, 2:17 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:38 p.m.