Triple
T11571441
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | balancing rocks |
E274394
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeThreatenedBy |
P583
|
FINISHED |
| Object | earthquakes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: earthquakes | Statement: [balancing rocks, canBeThreatenedBy, earthquakes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeThreatenedBy Context triple: [balancing rocks, canBeThreatenedBy, earthquakes]
-
A.
threatenedBy
Indicates that one entity poses a danger or potential harm to another entity.
-
B.
hasThreats
Indicates that one entity poses or is associated with potential danger, harm, or adverse consequences toward another entity.
-
C.
canBeDefendedIn
Indicates that something (such as a claim, action, or position) is capable of being justified or supported within a specified context, forum, or framework.
-
D.
susceptibleTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity is vulnerable or likely to be affected, harmed, or influenced by another entity or factor.
-
E.
recognizesThreat
Indicates that an entity identifies or acknowledges another entity or situation as a potential danger or source of harm.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae5ac3c81908d2b0a3a665665b2 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d88dd6913881908becf188c0a7a275 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d85dcbacd0819094d4a1237055affa |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:17 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:38 p.m.