Triple
T11563815
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Forged in the Barrens |
E274204
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesTribeSupport |
P100356
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Beast |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Beast | Statement: [Forged in the Barrens, includesTribeSupport, Beast]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesTribeSupport Context triple: [Forged in the Barrens, includesTribeSupport, Beast]
-
A.
includesTribe
Indicates that one entity contains, encompasses, or has within it a particular tribe as a member or component.
-
B.
sharesTribeWith
Indicates that two entities belong to the same tribe or tribal group.
-
C.
associatedTribeActivity
Indicates a relationship where a specific activity is linked to, practiced by, or characteristic of a particular tribe.
-
D.
classTribeSynergy
Indicates a synergistic relationship where a character’s class and tribe traits interact to provide combined or enhanced effects.
-
E.
associatedWithTribeFestival
Indicates a relationship where an entity is connected or linked to a specific tribe’s festival, such as by participation, organization, or relevance.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae5ac3c81908d2b0a3a665665b2 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d88dd321f88190a57ecaf079fbbc3f |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:42 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d85dc3fc2c8190bed7e2111301a77c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:17 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d87f2e67108190ac36bf47aac12fa8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:37 p.m.