Triple
T11550907
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Warnock’s dilemma |
E273886
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPossibleInterpretation |
P10718
|
FINISHED |
| Object | agreement |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: agreement | Statement: [Warnock’s dilemma, hasPossibleInterpretation, agreement]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPossibleInterpretation Context triple: [Warnock’s dilemma, hasPossibleInterpretation, agreement]
-
A.
containsInterpretationOf
Indicates that one entity includes or embodies an interpretation or understanding of another entity.
-
B.
intendedInterpretation
Indicates that one entity is meant to be understood or interpreted in a particular way, sense, or meaning relative to another.
-
C.
possibleMeaning
chosen
Indicates that something may plausibly represent, signify, or be interpreted as a particular meaning or sense.
-
D.
hasCulturalInterpretation
Indicates that something is understood, represented, or given meaning within a particular cultural context or tradition.
-
E.
isInterpretedDifferentlyIn
Indicates that the same item, event, or expression is understood or construed in a different way within a specified context, group, or setting.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae4dfa48190a3ab0b19a159a3c5 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d88a83f1e88190aabf11a4c8a6c9e5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8087e57b48190a4c253dc0210f9d4 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:37 p.m.