Triple

T11531306
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Warren Burger Court E273427 entity
Predicate notableCase P4 FINISHED
Object Terry v. Ohio E123410 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Terry v. Ohio | Statement: [Warren Burger Court, notableCase, Terry v. Ohio]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Terry v. Ohio
Context triple: [Warren Burger Court, notableCase, Terry v. Ohio]
  • A. Terry v. Ohio chosen
    Terry v. Ohio is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the legality of police "stop and frisk" searches based on reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause.
  • B. Brandenburg v. Ohio
    Brandenburg v. Ohio is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly strengthened free speech protections by establishing the "imminent lawless action" test for when advocacy of violence can be punished under the First Amendment.
  • C. Jacobellis v. Ohio
    Jacobellis v. Ohio is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the constitutional standards for obscenity under the First Amendment, famously associated with Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” concurrence.
  • D. Powers v. Ohio
    Powers v. Ohio is a 1991 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded Batson v. Kentucky by allowing criminal defendants to challenge racially discriminatory peremptory jury strikes even when the excluded jurors are of a different race than the defendant.
  • E. Lockett v. Ohio
    Lockett v. Ohio is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded the range of mitigating factors a sentencer must be allowed to consider before imposing the death penalty.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aae3fbec8190a14632a5df2538b6 completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d8839878948190b170e64629d6f2db completed April 10, 2026, 4:59 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e6856341b481909d2ee71893e6117b completed April 20, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:37 p.m.