Triple
T1151801
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Belshazzar |
E23691
|
entity |
| Predicate | moralTheme |
P25343
|
FINISHED |
| Object | divine judgment on arrogant rulers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: divine judgment on arrogant rulers | Statement: [Belshazzar, moralTheme, divine judgment on arrogant rulers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: moralTheme Context triple: [Belshazzar, moralTheme, divine judgment on arrogant rulers]
-
A.
moralImplication
Indicates that one situation, action, or state of affairs entails or suggests a particular moral judgment, obligation, or ethical consequence.
-
B.
moralStatus
Indicates the ethical standing or degree of moral consideration that one entity has in relation to another.
-
C.
virtue
Indicates that an entity possesses or exemplifies a morally good quality, trait, or behavior.
-
D.
philosophicalTheme
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
E.
ethicalDebate
Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a493f0d32c8190ac74bad3c87f2641 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:30 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bc744e7c81908f8612f2aad28600 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb50d19c81908a98dbbb04a8906f |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:18 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a4bc47fce48190825d3a877251f789 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:23 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:44 p.m.