Triple

T11502633
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over Transport Layer Security E272699 entity
Predicate relatedTo P37 FINISHED
Object RFC 821 E35264 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RFC 821 | Statement: [SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over Transport Layer Security, relatedTo, RFC 821]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: RFC 821
Context triple: [SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over Transport Layer Security, relatedTo, RFC 821]
  • A. RFC 821 chosen
    RFC 821 is the original Internet standard that formally defined the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) for electronic mail transmission.
  • B. RFC 2821
    RFC 2821 is an earlier Internet standard that defined the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) for email transmission before being superseded by RFC 5321.
  • C. RFC 822
    RFC 822 is an early Internet standard that defines the format of text-based email messages, including headers and addressing conventions.
  • D. RFC 5321
    RFC 5321 is the Internet standard that specifies the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) used for email transmission across IP networks.
  • E. RFC 882
    RFC 882 was an early Internet standard that originally specified the Domain Name System (DNS) protocol before being superseded by later RFCs such as RFC 1035.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6aae2c3748190bed2ea50dfb160dc completed April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d85de55cbc8190be71c2d03dc044f2 completed April 10, 2026, 2:18 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69e604bc1d3c81908497f1d19dcc2167 completed April 20, 2026, 10:49 a.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:36 p.m.