Triple
T11499245
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Area B (West Bank) |
E272619
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityResponsibilityFor |
P8728
|
FINISHED |
| Object | external security (Israel) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: external security (Israel) | Statement: [Area B (West Bank), securityResponsibilityFor, external security (Israel)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityResponsibilityFor Context triple: [Area B (West Bank), securityResponsibilityFor, external security (Israel)]
-
A.
securityResponsibilityModel
Indicates the framework or scheme that defines how security responsibilities are allocated and managed among involved parties.
-
B.
responsibleFor
Indicates that one entity has a duty, obligation, or role to manage, oversee, or be accountable for another entity or outcome.
-
C.
securityApparatusRole
Indicates the role or function an entity holds within a security or law-enforcement apparatus.
-
D.
securityArrangementsBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
-
E.
securityRole
Indicates that an entity holds a specific security-related role, permission level, or access profile within a system or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae1b09881909ce2ded3fa0c14fa |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d85de27db081909ccdb4ab0ef75bdb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 2:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d808736c5c8190899b5b3b2e797f65 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:36 p.m.