Triple
T11478244
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kingdom of Kent |
E272075
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalInnovation |
P48898
|
FINISHED |
| Object | earliest surviving Germanic law code in Western Europe |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: earliest surviving Germanic law code in Western Europe | Statement: [Kingdom of Kent, hasLegalInnovation, earliest surviving Germanic law code in Western Europe]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalInnovation Context triple: [Kingdom of Kent, hasLegalInnovation, earliest surviving Germanic law code in Western Europe]
-
A.
hasInnovationType
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified by, a specific type or category of innovation.
-
B.
hasNotableInnovation
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a significant, distinguishing innovation or breakthrough.
-
C.
hasLegalChange
Indicates that an entity has undergone or is associated with a modification in its legal status, rights, obligations, or regulatory conditions.
-
D.
innovationLevel
Indicates the degree or extent to which something is new, original, or creatively advanced compared to existing norms or solutions.
-
E.
hasLegalInstrument
Indicates that there exists a formal legal document or instrument that establishes, governs, or records the relationship between the related entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae0c8d881908a5a360c0be3242e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d8294e0fe08190b018e840146e27ca |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8086ecd6c81908f424864857762d6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:36 p.m.