Triple
T11470380
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Woman to be Examined |
E271888
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalRulingOn |
P41134
|
FINISHED |
| Object | acceptance of migrating believing women |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: acceptance of migrating believing women | Statement: [The Woman to be Examined, hasLegalRulingOn, acceptance of migrating believing women]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalRulingOn Context triple: [The Woman to be Examined, hasLegalRulingOn, acceptance of migrating believing women]
-
A.
legalRulingNature
Indicates the type or character of a legal ruling, such as its form, basis, or procedural nature.
-
B.
laysDownRulingOn
Indicates that an authority formally issues or establishes a decision, judgment, or rule concerning a particular matter or case.
-
C.
judgmentInvolves
chosen
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
D.
hasLowerCourtDecision
Indicates that a higher court case is associated with, or results from, a specific decision made by a lower court.
-
E.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae0c8d881908a5a360c0be3242e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d82949e3688190b024a4980666c94f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d8086ecd6c81908f424864857762d6 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 8:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:35 p.m.