Triple
T11469766
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Keswick |
E271870
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNeighbourhood |
P4813
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Keswick South |
E271870
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Keswick South | Statement: [Keswick, hasNeighbourhood, Keswick South]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Keswick South Context triple: [Keswick, hasNeighbourhood, Keswick South]
-
A.
Keswick Village
Keswick Village is a residential neighborhood located within the city of Chamblee in the Atlanta metropolitan area of Georgia.
-
B.
Keswick
Keswick is a historic market town and popular tourist base in England’s Lake District, known for its scenic setting near Derwentwater and surrounding fells.
-
C.
Keswick
chosen
Keswick is a suburban community within the town of Georgina in Ontario, Canada, situated along the southern shores of Lake Simcoe.
-
D.
Caldbeck
Caldbeck is a picturesque village in Cumbria, England, on the edge of the Lake District, known for its historic mining heritage and scenic rural surroundings.
-
E.
Wirksworth
Wirksworth is a historic market town in the Derbyshire Dales of England, known for its lead-mining heritage and picturesque limestone landscape.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aae0c8d881908a5a360c0be3242e |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d82949e3688190b024a4980666c94f |
completed | April 9, 2026, 10:33 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69e6042507c4819096afc2839fda186d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 10:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:35 p.m.