Triple
T11448526
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Division of State Purchasing |
E271329
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | procurement authority |
C2026
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: procurement authority Context triple: [Division of State Purchasing, instanceOf, procurement authority]
-
A.
procurement policy office
The procurement policy office is responsible for developing, implementing, and overseeing rules, guidelines, and standards that govern how an organization acquires goods and services to ensure fairness, compliance, and value for money.
-
B.
acquisition authority
chosen
Acquisition authority is the legally granted power or permission for an individual or organization to obtain, purchase, or otherwise secure goods, services, or assets on behalf of an entity.
-
C.
procurement management initiative
A procurement management initiative is a coordinated effort to optimize how an organization plans, sources, negotiates, and manages the acquisition of goods and services to reduce costs, improve quality, and ensure compliance.
-
D.
government procurement agreement
A government procurement agreement is a formal arrangement that sets rules and commitments for how public authorities purchase goods, services, and works, typically to ensure transparency, fairness, and non-discrimination among suppliers.
-
E.
appointing authority
An appointing authority is an individual or entity legally empowered to select, hire, promote, or otherwise make official personnel decisions for positions within an organization or governmental body.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6aadff8888190a13f253f0d460874 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:35 p.m.